Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Jung v. Cathiejung.com
as 1:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
Cathie Jung
Defendant:
Cathiejung.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Best Friends of Mississippi, Inc. v. Best Friends Crematory & Memorial Co., LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Best Friends of Mississippi, Inc. and Best Friends of Mississippi, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Friends Crematory & Memorial Co., LLC, John Collins, Jan Collins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carpe Diem Coffee Roasting Company v. Carpe Diem Coffee Shop, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv02606
Plaintiff:
Carpe Diem Coffee Roasting Company and Carpe Diem Coffee Roasting Company
Defendant:
Carpe Diem Coffee Shop, Inc. and Cathy Wyatt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al v. Victor Moseley, et al
as 08-5793
Plaintiff - Appellee:
V SECRET CATALOGUE, INC.
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
VICTOR MOSELEY, dba Victor's Little Secret, fka Victor's Secret and CATHY MOSELEY, dba Victor's Little Secret, fka Victor's Secret
Diane Von Furstenberg Studio v. Catherine Snyder
as 07-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIANE VON FURSTENBERG STUDIO
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHERINE SNYDER, d/b/a Cathy 3254, d/b/a katrina3254@vendio.com, d/b/a katrina 3254@mailstep.com, d/b/a Fairfax Trading Company
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1-15 and XYZ CORPORATION
Aire-Master of America, Inc. v. Cedar River Services, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
Aire-Master of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Cedar River Services, LLC, Dependable Property Services, Inc., Jan Douglas Warling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
DD IP Holder LLC v. Stickney et al
as 1:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
DD IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Earl Stickney, Cathy Stickney, Karl Aughinbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
