Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2023cv08110
Plaintiff: Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant: Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Corey Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 and 505 Pension v. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
as 23-2213
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMPLOYER-TEAMSTERS LOCAL NOS. 175 AND 505 PENSION TRUST FUND and UNIFORMED SANITATIONMEN'S LOCAL 831 COMPENSATION ACCRUAL FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: JEREMY A. LANGLEY
Defendant / Appellee: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION, HORACIO D. ROZANSKI, LLOYD W. HOWELL, JR. and others
In RE: Stanford Entities Securities Litigation
as 3:2009md02099
Plaintiff: Stanford Entities Securities Litigation, Barry L Rupert and Carol S. Rupert
Defendant: Trustmark National Bank and Center for Strategic and International Studies Inc
Respondent: Arch Specialty Insurance Co and Lexington Insurance Co
Interested Party: John J Little, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Greenberg Traurig LLP and others
Not Classified By Court: Attorney at Law Edward C Snyder and Ralph S. Janvey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Steinberg v. Schmitt Industries et al
as 3:2022cv01533
Plaintiff: Mr. Lloyd Steinberg and Lloyd Steinberg
Defendant: Schmitt Industries, Michael R Zapata, Philip Bosco and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Randolph v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv01000
Plaintiff: Michael Blake Randolph
Defendant: Richard N Barton, Erick Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Solak v. Rochford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00410
Defendant: Clayton E. Woodrum, Kelly Hoffman, Stanley M. McCabe and others
Plaintiff: John Solak
Nominal Defendant: Ring Energy, Inc.
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party: East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor: United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv01493
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Coffman v. Meritor, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03797
Plaintiff: Catherine Coffman
Defendant: Meritor, Inc., William R. Newlin, Chris Villavarayan and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?