Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Adrienne D. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL D. JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Tametha Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 22-1333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMETHA D. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline D. Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02246
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James D. Jones and James D Jones
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv02398
Plaintiff:
Tametha D Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Saul
as 6:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Patricia D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
