Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Lorah v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
Heath Reynold Lorah
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HEATH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
ANITRA HEATH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Banning v. SSA
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Heath R. Banning and Heather R. Banning
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Heath Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heath v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Janice Evon Heath
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Heath v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00393
Petitioner:
Molly Ann Heath
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hamilton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Heath Hamilton
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Heath B. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Heath v. Morris et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Eric Heath
Defendant:
Scott T. Morris, D'Lisa Simmons, Social Security Administration (Appeal Counsel) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Saul (CONSENT)
as 3:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Heath Alan Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
