Supplemental Security Income Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 140
Walberg v. Astrue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00956
Plaintiff: Tamara L Walberg
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hinckley v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00215
Plaintiff: Tamara Hinckley
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Halsey v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff: Tamara K. Halsey
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Getchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2007cv01706
Plaintiff: Tamara J. Getchell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dehzari v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00677
Plaintiff: Tamara D Dehzari
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tamara McCann v. Michael J Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00712
Plaintiff: Tamara McCann
Defendant: Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Baylis v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv00164
Plaintiff: Tamara C. Baylis
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jungenberg v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00312
Plaintiff: Tamara D. Jungenberg
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Beavers v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00086
Plaintiff: Tamara Beavers
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. SSA Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2001cv01039
Plaintiff: Tamara P Smith
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?