Cases 11 - 20 of 749
Ajam v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Ajam
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gordon et al v. Neronha et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Rev. Alan L. Gordon and Rev. Anne S. Armstrong
Defendant:
Peter F. Neronha, Robert P. McKenna, State of Rhode Island and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00081
Not Yet Classified:
Alexander Market Inc. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Judicial Review of Admin Determination by DOA
Fuenmayor v. Escalona
as 6:2023cv02387
Petitioner:
Henry Alexander Fuenmayor
Respondent:
Vanessa Andreina Escalona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
THE R2O GROUP LLC v. GRAVITY DEFYER, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv21827
Plaintiff:
THE R2O GROUP LLC
Defendant:
GRAVITY DEFYER, INC. and ALEXANDER ELNEKAVEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv14918
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Alexander
Defendant:
City of Chicago Heights and Chicago Heights Code Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cannabis Impact Prevention Coalition, LLC et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Cannabis Impact Prevention Coalition, LLC, Cannabis Industry Victims Seeking Justice, LLC, Rennee Barchitta and others
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, New York State Cannabis Control Board, New York State Office of Cannabis Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. At Home Auto Glass LLC et al
as 2:2023mc00034
In Re:
GlassBiller LLC
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
At Home Auto Glass LLC, William Camp and Nicholas Alexander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
