Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Bartola Pacetti v. Mark Millard
as 12-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARTOLA J. PACETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARK S. MILLARD, Judge and ALAN CARLSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, MARY HOLT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Smagala v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv04547
Plaintiff:
Gerard R. Smagala
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
JACKSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00680
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. JACKSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue
as 12-1461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARTOLA J. PACETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration and MARY HOLT
Defendant:
MARK S. MILLARD, Judge, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA and others
PERLAES v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERLAES
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Larson v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Sherry Larson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
William Paul v. Michael Astrue
as 12-5028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William D. Paul
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
ELY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ELY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pacetti v. Millard et al
as 1:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Bartola J. Pacetti
Defendant:
Mark S. Millard, Alan Carlson, Michael J. Astrue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Michelle McDonald v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE EVA MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
