Cases 11 - 20 of 43
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
State of Indiana et al v. Medical Informatics Engineering Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
NoMoreClipboard, LLC, Medical Informatics Engineering Inc and Medical Informatics Engineering Inc doing business as Enterprise Health LLC doing business as K&L Holdings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Withrow et al v. Regional West Medical Center et al
as 8:2018cv00469
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, State Board of Health Vital Records, Marci Mizelle, United States Department of Justice Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Withrow, David J. Withrow and Marilyn N. Withrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA , STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al v. Norris Cochran, Acting Secy, et al
as 17-10135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INCORPORATED, CHRISTIAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SOCIETY, SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS OF ILLINOIS, L.L.C. and others
Movant - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF TEXAS and RIVER CITY GENDER ALLIANCE
Franciscan Alliance, Inc. et al v. Burwell et al
as 7:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Franciscan Alliance, Inc. , Christian Medical and Dental Society , Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC and others
Defendant:
Sylvia Burwell and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Intervenor_defendant:
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and River City Gender Alliance
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Lindsay Jenkins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
