Cases 31 - 40 of 91
MCDANIEL et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv03913
Plaintiff:
STANLEY MCDANIEL
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOSEPH FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibbs v. Lloyd & McDaniel, PLC
as 2:2015cv02414
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gibbs
Defendant:
Lloyd & McDaniel, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASTRO v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
DENNIS CASTRO
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC and PCA ACQUISITIONS V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DeFranco v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeFranco
Defendant:
Cavalry SPV I, LLC and Lloyd and McDaniel, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carr et al v. Martinez et al
as 1:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kerman-Ray Carr and Priscilla-Denise Carr
Defendant:
Alex J. Martinez, Stephanie O'Malley, Robert White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Paramount Equity Mortgage, Inc
as 2:2014cv02896
Plaintiff:
Janice McDaniel
Defendant:
Paramount Equity Mortgage, Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Joseph McDaniels v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2014cv07780
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniels
MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. CenturyTel of Inter-Island, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01378
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc.
Defendant:
CenturyTel of Inter-Island, Inc., CenturyTel of Washington, Inc., Integra Telecom of Washington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chermak v. Carter et al
as 3:2014cv03072
Plaintiff:
Sarah Marie Chermak
Defendant:
Christopher Carter , Ron Kincade , Dustin McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Stockton et al
as 2:2014cv12196
Plaintiff:
David McDaniel
Defendant:
Thomas A Stockton and Credit Management L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
