Cases 31 - 40 of 272
Hopkins v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Morris, II v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2022cv02540
Plaintiff:
Gary L Morris, II
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
WALSH v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2022cv02282
Petitioner:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, NANCY MCINTYRE and ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Manning v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
John Manning
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Hopkins v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jewell v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Amanda Renee Jewell
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Jaime Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tacina v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jeff Tacina
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Binesh v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
Faz Binesh
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Konan v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv00139
Defendant:
Raymond Rojas, United States Postal Service, Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Lebene Konan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jernazian v. Coventry Homes et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tash Jernazian
Defendant:
Coventry Homes, Wildridge, Little Elm Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
