Cases 51 - 60 of 167
Shaw v. Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01597
Plaintiff:
Carla Shaw
Defendant:
Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Copeland v. Lawrence et al
as 5:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
Anne Lawrence , Carla D Haddard, Mary B Stanley Renouf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES U.S.A., INC. et al v. CHOU et al
as 1:2017cv00533
Petitioner:
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES U.S.A., INC. and FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD'S.
Respondent:
CHARLES CHOU , ROBERT COHANE , ARIA BASHIZADEH FAKHAR and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Plaintiff:
Jason L Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Patrick Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 6:2017fj00001
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Catherine Evangelos and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
DeCosta v. First Collect, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
Carla DeCosta
Defendant:
First Collect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ogburn v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00708
Plaintiff:
Carla T Ogburn
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Finkelstein, Kern, Steinberg & Cunningham, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Edwards v. Columbia Community Unit School District #4 et al
as 3:2016cv01254
Plaintiff:
Carla Edwards
Defendant:
Columbia Community Unit School District #4 and John & Jane Doe School District Employees 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN THE MATTER OF EILEEN CARLA BURKE - #175700
as 3:2016mc80237
Respondent:
Eileen Carla Burke
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA ex rel., Carla Crockett v. Complete Fitness Rehab Inc.
as 16-2544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL., CARLA CROCKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
COMPLETE FITNESS REHABILITATION, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
