Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00006
Respondent:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
ACTAVIS INC., ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mi00001
Respondent:
King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
J M Smith Corporation v. Cystic Fibrosis Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv01924
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation
Defendant:
Cystic Fibrosis Pharmacy, Inc., HHCS Pharmacy, Inc. and N. Lois Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
McDonald County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2020op45225
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP formerly known as Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. doing business as Walmart #5261, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
McDonald County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDonald County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2020cv00620
Defendant:
Total RX Services, Inc., Cardinal Health 110, LLC, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
McDonald County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wyoming County Commission v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45051
Plaintiff:
Wyoming County Commission
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation , Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wyoming County Commission v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv02311
Plaintiff:
Wyoming County Commission
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation , Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
