Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Houlsen v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01817
Plaintiff:
Adam Houlsen
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maul v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01215
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Maul
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cox v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 8:2019cv01760
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cox
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Echeverria v. Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00421
Defendant:
Echeverria Salomon, CVI SGP-CO Acquisition Trust and Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc
Plaintiff:
Salomon Echeverria
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SHELTON v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2019cv00443
Plaintiff:
DAWN SHELTON
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Yang v. Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services LP, LVNV Funding LLC and Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc
Plaintiff:
Twinky Yang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burnes v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burnes
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burke v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 8:2018cv01507
Plaintiff:
Patricia Burke
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Maxwell v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2018cv08266
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Plaintiff:
Katrina Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MARCONI v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04411
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARCONI
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
