Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Propst v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Propst
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Susan Whitlock and Charles Propst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Brian Calvert, et al v. BPS Direct LLC, et al
as 23-3235
Defendant / Appellee:
In re: BPS DIRECT LLC and CABELAS LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID IRVIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN CALVERT, HEATHER CORNELL and others
Marilyn Seay Propst v. State of West Virginia
as 23-2112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARILYN E. SEAY PROPST
Plaintiff:
DAWN PROPST, CHARLES PROPST, DAWN LOCKARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, JERRY MOORE, JEFF BOWERS and others
Seay et al v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marilyn E Seay Propst, Charles Propst, Kathy Propst and others
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Jerry Moore, Jeff Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniels v. 25 Lafayette Investors, LLC
as 23-1105
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marilyn Daniels, AKA Marilyn Foster-Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Foster, AKA Marilyn Foster, AKA Marilyn Daniels-EL and Kenneth Daniels, AKA Kenneth Daniels-El
Respondent / Appellee:
25 Lafayette Investors, LLC
Hernandez v. BPS Direct, L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
MARILYN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
BPS DIRECT, LLC doing business as BASS PRO SHOPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Hernandez v. Carnival Corporation
as 3:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
MARILYN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Conneran v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60986
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Conneran
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hernandez v. Noom, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
MARILYN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
NOOM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
