Cases 1 - 10 of 2,505
Robert Davis v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ALISHA BELL, Chairperson/Chairwomen of the Wayne County Board of Commissioners, TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Owner of Gaukler Pointe Communications, LLC and others
Mongeau v. Blinken et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keegan Haig Mongeau
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Marissa Scott and Aimee Cutrona
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kuluva et al v. Taylor
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
William Kuluva, Kastle Ventures, LLC and Sterling Gaming International, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
In re: John Walter Scott Acheson III
as 2:2024rd00024
Not Yet Classified:
John Walter Scott Acheson, III
Cohen v. Arnold Scott Harris, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris, P.C., Harris & Harris, Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MADLINGER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06185
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MADLINGER
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., JOHN DOES and ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re Jason Scott Harper
as 5:2024cv01027
Not Yet Classified:
Jason Scott Harper
Plaintiff:
Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Rob Bonta, David Holbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA v. PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE and ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
