Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jackson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 4:2022cv13150
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bradley Lane, Merik Whipple and others
Broom v. Does 1-25 et al
as 3:2018cv01515
Defendant:
John Does 1-25, Whipple Law, P.A. and MSW Capital, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wayne Broom
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abrahams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11519
Plaintiff:
Peter Cullen, Duwayne Tinsley, Joseph Cerrato and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
WHIPPLE v. GOVAN et al
as 2:2018cv04325
Defendant:
SEAN P WHALEN and SETH GOVAN
Plaintiff:
RUBYE WHIPPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHIPPLE v. GOVAN et al
as 2:2018cv04284
Defendant:
SETH GOVAN and SEAN P. WHALEN
Plaintiff:
RUBYE WHIPPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks v. Whipple et al
as 0:2018cv60452
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Hicks
Defendant:
Lawrence A. Whipple, Jr. , Whipple Law P.A. and MSW Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whipple v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv05181
Plaintiff:
Ken Whipple
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Dirito Brothers Walnut Creek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GREENE et al v. PASSAGES HOSPICE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00992
Defendant:
CRAIG J. FRANK, MICHAEL GILLMAN, SETH GILLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY GREENE, KRISTA GRUBER, ANN MCKENZIE HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA, et al v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Co Hosp.
as 13-6645
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WHIPPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, dba Erlanger Medical Center, dba Erlanger Health System
Haghgoo v. National Credit Adjusters LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00406
Plaintiff:
Linda Haghgoo
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters LLC and David Whipple
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
