Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Clark, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-2141
Plaintiff / Appellant: GUY CLARK, LINDA CORWIN, CRAIG CORWIN and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, CAMILLE C. TOUTON, in her official capacity as Deputy Commissioner, United States Bureau of Reclamation, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and others
Citizens for Clean Energy, et al v. National Mining Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35789
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ENERGY, ECOCHEYENNE, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF MONTANA
Citizens for Clean Energy, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 22-35790
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ENERGY, ECOCHEYENNE, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF MONTANA
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff: State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant: Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of New Mexico, et al v. United States et al
as 2:2020cv02115
Plaintiff: New Mexico Environment Department, Hector Balderas and State of New Mexico
Interested Party: Tyco Fire Products LP and Chemguard Inc
Amicus Curiae: Senator Antoinette Lopez, Representative Andres Romero and Senator Mimi Stewart
Defendant: United States and United States Air Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv02826
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, United States and others
Petitioner: NATIONAL COALITION FOR ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC. and COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. E. SCOTT PRUITT et al Featured Case
as 1:2018cv00773
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF CALIFORNIA , STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: E. SCOTT PRUITT and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
In Re: Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015
as 1:2018md02824
Defendant: Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015, Gold King Mines Corporation, John Does and others
Plaintiff: Navajo Nation, State of New Mexico, Fannie Marie Jim and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Environmental Restoration, LLC
Special Master: Alan C. Torgerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of New Mexico et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00042
Plaintiff: State of California , State of New Mexico , State of New York and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior , Ryan Zinke and United States Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
State of Wyoming et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2016cv00285
Petitioner: State of Wyoming and State of Montana
Respondent: United States Department of the Interior , United States Department of Interior Secretary , United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Movant: State of California and State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?