Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, WILDLANDS NETWORK, a non-profit organization and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, MARTHA WILLIAMS, as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
United States Department of Justice v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00984
Defendant:
Dyno Nobel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
as 2:2019cv12818
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
as 1:2019cv12818
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Bell Foundry Co et al
as 2:2016cv07389
Defendant:
Bell Foundry Co and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Interested Party:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. NC Dept of Environment
as 15-2003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES, JOHN E. SKVARLA, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and TOM REEDER, Director, Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
PAMLICO-TAR RIVER FOUNDATION, FRIENDS OF POCOSIN LAKES NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INCORPORATED
United States v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 3:2014cv00089
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1251
Huntress et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2012cv01146
Plaintiff:
William L. Huntress , Acquest Development, LLC and Acquest Transit, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , William J. Hochul, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
