Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
Brake Plus NWA, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 5:2023cv05185
Plaintiff: Brake Plus NWA, Inc., William & Lake, LLC and Williams & Lake, LLC
Defendant: United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
STATE OF FLORIDA v. Buttigieg et al
as 0:2023cv61890
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant: Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Department of Transportation, Acting Secretary of Julie A Su and others
Intervenor Defendant: Amalgamated Transit Union International and Transit Workers Union of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nat'l Trust for Historic Pres. in the US, et al v. Buttigieg, et al
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, FRIENDS OF THE FRANK J. WOOD BRIDGE, HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, TODD JORGENSEN, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Highway Administration Maine Division, BRUCE VAN NOTE, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Maine Department of Transportation and others
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03885
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHAILEN BHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
gh Package Product Testing and Consulting, Inc. v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, et al
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff: gh Package Product Testing and Consulting, Inc.
Defendant: Peter M. Buttigieg, Tristan Brown, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of TX v. EPA
as 23-40306
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
State of Texas et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Commission On Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Protect Our Parks, Inc., et al v. Pete Buttigieg, et al
as 22-3190
Plaintiff / Appellant: PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., SID E. WILLIAMS, BREN A. SHERIFF and others
Defendant / Appellee: PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, STEPHANIE POLLACK, Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, ARLENE KOCHER, Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, Illinois Division and others
Renew 81 For All et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2022cv01244
Plaintiff: Renew 81 For All, Charles Garland, Garland Bros. of Syracuse, Inc. and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, Richard J. Marquis, New York State Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?