Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Centro Legal de la Raza et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al
as 3:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
Tahirih Justice Center, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Centro Legal de la Raza and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alameda County Public Defender's Office, University of California, Los Angeles Immigration Law Clinic, Former Immigration Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC. et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al
as 1:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT, BROOLYN DEFENDER SERVICES, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC. and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL NETWORK TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, FREEDOM NETWORK USA, FORMER IMMIGRATION JUDGES AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Immigration Equality et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09258
Plaintiff:
Black LGBTQIA Migrant Project, Immigration Equality, The Translatin@ Coalition and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AIDS United, Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Casa De Maryland, Inc. et al v. Wolf et al
as 8:2020cv02118
Plaintiff:
Oasis Legal Services, Pangea Legal Services, Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Chad F. Wolf
Amicus Curiae:
KIND (Kids In Need of Defense), Morton Rosenberg, Oxfam America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
STARK et al v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. STARK and WILDLIFE IN NEED AND WILDLIFE IN DEED, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and MIKE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
