Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Inter Insurance Agency Services Ltd. et al v. Insurance Department of the State of Oklahoma et al
as 2:2024cv03720
Plaintiff: Inter Insurance Agency Services Ltd. and Universal Casualty Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant: Insurance Department of the State of Oklahoma and Glen Mulready
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Boze et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff: Daniel Gene Boze, Jimmy Joe Boze and Mary Ruth Boze
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency and Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dupree Farms, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al
as 5:2023cv00360
Plaintiff: Dupree Farms, LLC
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency and Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating For Campus Equality, et al
as 21-1853
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Cardona, et al
as 21-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, ANNE DOE, EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1777
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others
Finneman v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 5:2023cv05034
Plaintiff: David Finneman
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Managment Agency and Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tina Roberts v. Raul Sanchez, et al
as 23-55323
Plaintiff / Appellant: TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee: RAUL SANCHEZ, Risk Management Public Libility 1200 Third Ave Suit 100 MS 518S, BRENDA HILL, Risk Management Public Libility 1200 Third Ave Suit 100 MS 518S, MAGANA, Badge Number 1036; NPD and Dispatcher and others
Cohrs v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv00126
Plaintiff: Allen W Cohrs
Defendant: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, Risk Management Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Miller v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, et al
as 5:2023cv00069
Plaintiff: Derick Miller
Defendant: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, The Risk Management Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas J. Vilsack, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?