Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff: Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant: United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Petitioner: Ohio, State of
Amicus Curiae: Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant: United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chavez v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Koby Chavez
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hans Lasway v. Kathy Baran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant: HANS IKAMBA LASWAY and IKUMBO CHARLOTTE NYANGE
Defendant / Appellee: KATHY A. BARAN, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, California Service Center Director, UR M. JADDOU, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service Director, Office of the General Counsel, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, United States Secretary Department of Homeland Security and others
Kaur et al v. United States Attorney General,et al
as 2:2023cv11030
Plaintiff: Satinder Kaur and Sukhwinderjit Singh
Defendant: United States Attorney General, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Huesca-Abaroa et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv10707
Plaintiff: Alberto E. Huesca-Abaroa and Otilia Rivera-Huesca
Defendant: United States Attorney General, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Castillo et al v. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv10708
Plaintiff: Juan P. Castillo and Eliuth Montiel-Fragoso
Defendant: United States Attorney General, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Posey v. Garland, et al. (JRG1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff: Terry Posey doing business as Posey Gun and Pawn
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Citizens Caring for the Future et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff: Citizens Caring for the Future, New Mexico Interfaith Power and Light, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant: Secretary of the Int Debra Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, Deb Haaland and others
Not Classified By Court: United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico and United States Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Movsas v. Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv23794
Plaintiff: Lisa Sharon Movsas
Defendant: UR M JADDOU, Alejandro Marorkas, Alyssa Emmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?