Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
BRAASCH et al v. LAMB et al
as 4:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
David Braasch, Tamara McLaughlin, Lisana Mohamed and others
Defendant:
Brian Lamb, in his official capacity as chair of the Florida Board of Governors, Eric Silagy, in his official capacity as vice chair of the Florida Board of Governors, Manny Diaz, Jr., in his official capacity as Florida Commissioner of Education and a member of the Florida Board of Governors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio Gen LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, John Timothy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Wilmington Food Not Bombs et al v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Food Not Bombs, Madison Daley and George Jones
Defendant:
Kathy Jennings and City of Wilmington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, et al v. Town of Mcintosh
as 5:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
JASON JONES and Heather Clark
Defendant:
Town of Mcintosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GOODLIN v. ROSE et al
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
HERBERT SETH GOODLIN
Defendant:
ALEX ROSE, delaware county daily times, FOLCROFT BOROUGH DETECTIVE CORPORAL DANIEL E. WHITE, OFFICIALLY AND IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC v. Andrew Ritter
as 23-1472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
360 VIRTUAL DRONE SERVICES LLC and MICHAEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW L. RITTER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JOHN M. LOGSDON, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JONATHAN S. CARE, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors and others
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP and others
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Sean Tindell, Bo Luckey and others
Petitioner:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, PEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
