Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Jallal v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff: Samuel A. Jallad
Defendant: Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, sec.gov/Chair Gary Gensler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice et al v. Bird et al
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice, Jane Doe and Elizabeth Roe
Defendant: Iowa Attorney General, Clayton County Attorney and Polk County Attorney
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Consumer Data Industry Association v. Acting Attorney General New Jersey
as 24-1810
Plaintiff: CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Defendant: ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01881
Plaintiff: ZUMAR H DUBOSE
Defendant: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S.P.S. OIG and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Ward v. Bonta et al
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff: Thomas Ward
Defendant: Attorney General Rob Bonta, Donna Ward and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Cynthia Brown, et al v. David Yost
as 24-3354
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA BROWN, CARLOS BUFORD and JENNY SUE ROWE
Defendant: DAVID YOST, In his Official Capacity as Ohio Attorney General
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2024cv01694
Plaintiff: ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff: ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Healthy Vision Assoc v. Abbott
as 24-10245
Plaintiff: Healthy Vision Association, National Association of Vision Care Plans, Incorporated, Vision Service Plan Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Greg Abbott, as Governor of the State of Texas, Ken Paxton, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas and Cassie Brown, in her capacity as the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Texas
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?