Cases 101 - 110 of 237
McGann v. Hernandez a/k/a Bruno Mars et al
as 1:2017cv09094
Plaintiff:
Catherine McGann
Defendant:
Peter Gene Hernandez and Warner Music Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
IRVIN v. WEA INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2017cv02404
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN
Defendant:
WEA INTERNATIONAL, WARNER BROS INC., WARNER MUSIC NASHVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Yesh Music, LLC v. Warner Music Group Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv08176
Plaintiff:
Yesh Music, LLC
Defendant:
Warner Music Group Corp., Warner Music Inc., Ninho and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Webb et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv07595
Plaintiff:
Santrise N. Webb and The Board Administration, LLC
Defendant:
Tiara Thomas, TNT Music, Inc., Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dawicki v. Universal Music Group et al
as 3:2017cv30137
Plaintiff:
David Stanley Dawicki
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Elektra Atlantic Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Southgate v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01047
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C. Southgate
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, Allison D. Burroughs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
In Re: Digital Music Antitrust
as 17-2367
Petitioner:
Richard Benham, Ronald Donahue, Rachel Hall and others
Respondent:
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., Warner Music Group Corp. and others
McGregor v. VP Records et al
as 1:2017cv03917
Plaintiff:
Kemar McGregor
Defendant:
ADA Music, Greensleeves Publishing Ltd., Greensleeves Records Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Archer v. Holmes et al
as 1:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Archer
Defendant:
London Holmes, 300 Entertainment LLC, BMG Gold Songs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sabrina Renee Brown v. Warner Music Group
as 17-1314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SABRINA RENEE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER MUSIC GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
