Cases 121 - 130 of 180
Marcus et al v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2014cv03824
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Plaintiff:
Uriel Marcus and Benedict Verceles
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
R. Andre Klein v. Timothy D. Cook, et al
as 5:2014cv03634
Plaintiff:
R. Andre Klein
Defendant:
Timothy D. Cook, William V. Campbell, Millard ("Mickey") Drexler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Charlene Gallion, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 14-16084
:
In re: APPLE IPHONE/IPOD WARRANTY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLENE GALLION, DANIEL CALIX and CHRISTOPHER CORSI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
MICHAEL CASEY
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC., a California corporation
Apple Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00178
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2014cv00082
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Uriel Marcus and Benedict Verceles
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Andre McSwain v. Laurene Job
as 14-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE J. MCSWAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURENE POWELL JOBS, APPLE, INC. and GOOGLE, INCORPORATED
In re: Garen Meguerian, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 13-17338
:
In re: APPLE IN-APP PURCHASE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GAREN MEGUERIAN, LAUREN SCOTT, KATHLEEN KOFFMAN and others
Objector - Appellant:
CINDY MURREY
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC., a California corporation
MCSWAIN v. JOBS
as 1:2013cv00890
Plaintiff:
ANDRE J. MCSWAIN
Defendant:
LAURENE POWELL JOBS , APPLE INC. and GOOGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
F.B. T. Productions, LLC et al v. Aftermath Records et al
as 2:2007cv03314
Defendant:
Aftermath Records, Interscope Records, UMG Recording, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Em2M, LLC and F.B. T. Productions, LLC
Interested Party:
Rick James and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
