Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Thompson et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv11692
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Citimortgage, Inc., a New York Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Thompson and Mindy S. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Granite Re, Inc. v. C & L Construction Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Granite Re, Inc.
Defendant:
C & L Construction Inc. , Christopher S. Thompson , Lorrie A. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brautigam v. Rubin
as 14-3885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael G. Brautigam, an Individual
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Timothy C. Collins
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert E. Rubin, C. Michael Armstrong, John M. Deutch and others
Thompson v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Thompson
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Thompson
as 2:2013cv02019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Talisha S. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Thompson et al v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 4:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
James S Thompson and Mary Young
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitzpatrick v. Rubin et al
as 1:2011cv02822
Plaintiff:
William Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Robert E. Rubin, C. Michael Armstrong, John M. Deutch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brautigam v. Rubin et al
as 1:2011cv02693
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Brautigam
Defendant:
Robert E. Rubin, C. Michael Armstrong, John M. Deutch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King & Ballow v. Michael Thompson
as 09-6477
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KING & BALLOW
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. THOMPSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
