Cases 11 - 20 of 25
LEE v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 2:2020cv09595
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 1:2020cv02162
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, Elizabeth Optical, Inc., Edward Gershovich and others
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Cush-EL v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2019cv02771
Plaintiff:
U'Eea Cush-EL
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Synchrony Bank Headquaters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLaughlin v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05447
Defendant:
DSG Missouri d/b/a Ashley Homestores, Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and Synchrony Bank
Plaintiff:
Mary McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cole v. Synchrony Bank, et al.
as 1:2019cv00628
Plaintiff:
theodore cole and lori cole
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK and Park West Gallery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEEKE et al v. LOWES HOME CENTERS LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08239
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK, KEYSTONE CONSTRUCTION, LOWES HOME CENTERS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROXANA PEEKE, MARIANA MARIN and a/k/a ROXANA RITO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rivera-Narvaez et al v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2018cv01896
Plaintiff:
Adela Rosado Maldonado, Francisco Rivera Narvaez, Adela Rosado-Maldonado and others
Defendant:
JC Penney Corporation, Inc., Synchrony Bank, Old Navy Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walmart Inc. et al v. Synchrony Bank
as 5:2018cv05216
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 2:2018cv00271
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Safe Step Walk-In Tub Co.
Plaintiff:
F. Howard Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Synchrony Bank
as 2:2018cv10615
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
