Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Drain v. Medtronic Inc
as 2:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Timothy Drain
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waguespack v. Medtronic Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00241
Intervenor Plaintiff:
K2M, Inc.
Plaintiff - Consolidated:
Lloyd Lile Lindsey, III and Stephen Powell
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robby J. Waguespack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Raymund Navarro et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01166
Defendant:
Does and Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymund Navarro and Steven Ray
Charlotte Kokocinski v. Arthur D. Collins, Jr., et al
as 15-3519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charlotte Kokocinski, derivatively on behalf of Medtronic, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Arthur D. Collins, Jr., William A. Hawkins, Gary Ellis and others
Movant - Appellee:
Special Litigation Committee
Clark v. Ishrak et al
as 0:2014cv04142
Defendant:
Omar Ishrak, Gary L. Ellis, Christopher J. O'Connell and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hockstein v. Collins, Jr. et al
as 0:2014cv04020
Plaintiff:
Richard Hockstein
Defendant:
Arthur D. Collins, Jr., William A. Hawkins, Omar Ishrak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taxman v. Covidien PLC et al
as 1:2014cv12949
Plaintiff:
Richard Taxman
Defendant:
Covidien PLC, Medtronic, Inc., Makani II Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friddle v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 6:2012cv02248
Plaintiff:
Mara Friddle
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Medtronic, Inc. et al v. Royer et al
as 3:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ralph Royer and Melody Royer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kococinski v. Collins et al
as 0:2012cv00633
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Kococinski
Defendant:
Arthur D. Collins, Jr. , William A. Hawkins , Gary Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
