Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Bank of America, N.A. v. Allan L Davis
as 5:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Allan L. Davis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis et al v. Finemark National Bank & Trust
as 1:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Idaho Trust Bank , William L Davis and Patricia Davis
Defendant:
Finemark National Bank & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chelsea Davis v. Supreme Court of Texas
as 15-40637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHELSEA L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Defaulted Student Loan
Davis v. Supreme Court of Texas
as 4:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Texas
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Crop Production Services Inc v. Davis et al
as 4:2014cv00405
Plaintiff:
Crop Production Services Inc
Defendant:
Charles L Davis, Robert C Davis and B&C Davis Farm Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Morris Visitor Publications, Inc. v. Davis
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Morris Visitor Publications, Inc.
Defendant:
Merrie L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riceland Foods Inc v. Gray Ritter & Graham PC et al
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Riceland Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Gray Ritter & Graham PC , Don M. Downing , Adam J. Levitt and others
Counter_claimant:
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLC , Gray Ritter & Graham PC , Davis Bethune & Jones LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
Riceland Foods, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Neblett Beard & Arsenault LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeness et al v. Lennar Reno, LLC
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Allison Arevalo, Juaquin Arevalo, Michael Beck and others
Defendant:
Lennar Reno, LLC
Petitioner:
Joan C. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
