Cases 81 - 90 of 187
Charlotte Prime, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prime, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. and Comtran Group, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
AT&T Corp.
Cross_defendant:
Comtran Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
INSIDEMYCITY, LLC v. AT&T Corp
as 7:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
INSIDEMYCITY, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bush v. AT&T Corp.
as 5:2012cv06106
Plaintiff:
Jim Bush
Defendant:
AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Charlotte Prime, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 3:2012cv00594
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prime, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. and Comtran Group, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
AT&T Corp.
Cross_defendant:
Comtran Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aventure Communications Technology, LLC et al., v AT&T Corp
as 4:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Aventure Communications Technology, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Net/Town Telephone Corporation, LLC v. AT&T Corp.
as 1:2012cv00777
Defendant:
AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff:
Net/Town Telephone Corporation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AT&T, et al., v. The Frank Gates Service Company
as 2:2012cv00682
Defendant:
The Frank Gates Service Company
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp. and SBC Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orbitcom, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
as 4:2012cv04100
Plaintiff:
Orbitcom, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERVICES, LLC v. AT&T CORP.
as 2:2012cv01356
Plaintiff:
DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T Corp. v. Gates et al
as 1:2012cv01836
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Francis Gates, Pati Hensely, Sara Hensely and others
Interpleader:
Craig Baker, Patricia Henley and Jim Olsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
