Cases 171 - 180 of 239,521
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 8:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 8:2024cv03145
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Taste the Tropics, Inc. v. Guerrino
as 1:2024cv08227
Plaintiff:
Taste the Tropics, Inc.
Defendant:
Rudy Guerrino individually doing business as The Ice Cream Factory
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
DiStefano Website Innovations, LLC v. ByteDance Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Defendant:
ByteDance Pte. Ltd., HELIOPHILIA PTE. LTD, TIK TOK LTD and others
Plaintiff:
DiStefano Website Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Inland Technology Incorporated v. Allen Company Inc
as 3:2024cv05913
Defendant:
Allen Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Inland Technology Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Jetaire Aerospace, LLC v. AerSale Inc.
as 25-1127
Counter-Defendant:
JETAIRE FLIGHT SYSTEMS, LLC and MICHAEL D. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JETAIRE AEROSPACE, LLC
Defendant:
AERSALE INC.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 47.145.127.111
as 2:2024cv09283
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 47.145.127.111
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 172.251.231.182
as 2:2024cv09284
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 172.251.231.182
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv09285
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.