Cases 31 - 40 of 40
PGxHealth, LLC et al v. Toronto Research Chemicals, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11191
Plaintiff:
PGxHealth, LLC
Defendant:
Toronto Research Chemicals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
PIECZENIK v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 3:2010cv02296
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PIECZENIK
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, NOVO NORDISK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PIECZENIK v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv02230
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PIECZENIK
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
K.O. Manufacturing, Inc. v. K.C. Chemicals. Inc.
as 6:2010cv03147
Plaintiff:
K.O. Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
K.C. Chemicals. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Osmose, Inc. v. Arch Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Osmose, Inc.
Defendant:
Arch Chemicals, Inc., Arch Wood Protection, Inc., Arch Treatment Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Spindler et al v. Baker & Daniels LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
William Spindler, Northstar Creations LLC and Wayne Chemical Inc
Defendant:
Baker & Daniels LLP, Baker & Daniels LLP, Baker & Daniels LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wayne Chemical Inc v. PureLabs LLC
as 1:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
Wayne Chemical Inc and Wayne Chemical Inc
Defendant:
PureLabs LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Celanese International v Oxyde Chemicals
as 4:2007cv02981
Plaintiff:
Celanese International Corporation
Defendant:
Oxyde Chemicals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Solvay Chemicals Inc. v. OCI Chemical Corporation
as 1:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
Solvay Chemicals Inc.
Defendant:
OCI Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited et al v. AIDP Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02050
Plaintiff:
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited, Tate & Lyle Technology Limited, Tate & Lyle Technology Limited and others
Defendant:
Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd and others
Counter Claimant:
US Niutang Chemical Inc
Counter Defendant:
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited and Tate & Lyle Sucralose Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
