Cases 61 - 70 of 151
Westech Aerosol Corporation v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2017cv05067
Plaintiff:
Westech Aerosol Corporation
Defendant:
3M Company and GTA-NHT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
3M Company v. Trudell Medical International
as 0:2016cv04405
Plaintiff:
3M Company
Defendant:
Trudell Medical International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Andover Healthcare Inc. v. 3M Company
as 1:2013cv00843
Plaintiff:
Andover Healthcare Inc.
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. 3M Company
as 2:2015cv01284
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Plaintiff:
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
3M Company
Consolidated Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Allstate Insurance Company, AOS, Inc. d/b/a Trading Block and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
3M Company v. 3 M's Auto Sales Enterprises LLC
as 4:2015cv00704
Plaintiff:
3M Company
Defendant:
3 M's Auto Sales Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Innovative Automation LLC v. 3M Company
as 2:2015cv01334
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
3M Company et al v. Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv02565
Plaintiff:
3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company
Defendant:
Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc. and Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PGI Polymer, Inc. et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2015cv00212
Plaintiff:
PGI Polymer, Inc. and Polymer Group, Inc.
Defendant:
3M Company and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
3M Company et al v. Danville Materials, LLC
as 0:2015cv01591
Plaintiff:
3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company
Defendant:
Danville Materials, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
3M Company v. 3M's Automotive Inc.
as 8:2015cv00293
Plaintiff:
3M Company
Defendant:
3M's Automotive Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
