Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cure JM Foundation v. CureJDM Incorporated et al
as 8:2026cv01942
Plaintiff:
Cure JM Foundation
Defendant:
CureJDM Incorporated and David Anthony Addario, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baltes v. Tigereye Promotions, LLC
as 3:2026cv00214
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baltes
Defendant:
Tigereye Promotions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Reyna v. Suno, Inc
as 1:2026cv12830
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Anthony Reyna individually doing business as JOECAT
Defendant:
Suno, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOEL J. KOFSKY, P.C. v. CORNEJO LAW GROUP et al
as 2:2026cv04199
Plaintiff:
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOEL J. KOFSKY, P.C.
Defendant:
CORNEJO LAW GROUP and ANTHONY CORNEJO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Davide Olivieri
as 26-1783
Plaintiff:
DESIGN GAPS, INC. and DAVID GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVIDE OLIVIERI, DORIANA OLIVIERI, DD LUXE DESIGN, LLC and others
Anthony Mallgren v. USA
as 26-5217
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brian Mallgren
Defendant:
United States of America
Spinelli v. Sunray Optical Inc.
as 0:2026cv02855
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Spinelli
Defendant:
Sunray Optical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Roper Technologies, Inc. v. Cella et al
as 5:2026cv00390
Defendant:
Ramzi Alafandi, Anthony Cella, Ramsey Alafandi and others
Plaintiff:
Roper Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rockefeller Photos, LLC v. E. Marinos, Inc.
as 1:2026cv12098
Plaintiff:
Rockefeller Photos, LLC
Defendant:
E. Marinos, Inc. doing business as Anthonys Pizzeria
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Anthony Tave v. Four Star Distribution, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2026cv04869
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tave
Defendant:
Four Star Distribution, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
