Cases 11 - 20 of 2,976
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
BRANDON K. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harper v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04075
Plaintiff:
Julie K. Harper
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hartman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Rebecca K. Hartman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hooks v. SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Amira K Hooks
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meguire v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Virginia K. Meguire
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wynn v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11131
Plaintiff:
Terrance K. Wynn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Amanda K. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Tibbens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Tibbens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Avila v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
John K. Avila
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
