Cases 31 - 40 of 7,303
BROUGH v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
THELMA D. BROUGH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Riki D. Gurrola Quintana v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Riki D. Gurrola Quintana
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Adrienne D. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04307
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Kaczmarczyk v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Kaczmarczyk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
West v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50122
Plaintiff:
Rodney D West
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MURAWSKI v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. MURAWSKI
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Linton v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Linton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Backus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Kalieka D. Backus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lal v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Lal
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
