Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Laws v. Commissioner, SSA
as 6:2012cv00328
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Laws
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
Randal Law v. Social Security Administration, et al
as 11-51231
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDAL W. LAW
Respondent - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Law v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2011cv00074
Respondent:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue and Social Security Administration
Petitioner:
Randal W. Law
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Sylvia Jackson v. Michael Astrue
as 10-2226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVIA JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, at Office of Disability Adjudication (Administrative Law Judges)
Law v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00874
Plaintiff:
Colleen Law
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Social Security Law Center, LLC v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Social Security Law Center, LLC
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MacLeay v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 10-2671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Scott MacLeay
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security, Marilyn D. Zahm, Administrative Law Judge and Dujuan E. Brown
Gordon v. Astrue
as 09-2176
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Comissioner of Social Security
Movant - Appellant:
MARTONE LAW FIRM
BUKSA v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 3:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
SARAH BUKSA
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kenny Kellems, et al v. Commissioner Social Security
as 09-10676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNY KELLEMS and DAVID KELLEMS
Appellant:
JENNIFER LOUISE FRY and MORGAN & WEISBROD, L.L.P., Law Firm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
