Cases 1 - 10 of 1,092
BENNETT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
ERIC BENNETT
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DeCava v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01446
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Eric T. DeCava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Boatman v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Richard Eric Boatman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Madlock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Madlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Aparicio
as 2:2024cv07390
Plaintiff:
Eric Ernesto Aparicio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Simon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv05991
Plaintiff:
Eric Simon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sines v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02474
Plaintiff:
Eric Carlton Sines
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Acosta v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00627
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Eric Acosta
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Shaw-Stearns v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Eric M Shaw-Stearns
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
DIXON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv08609
Plaintiff:
ERIC DIXON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
