Cases 1 - 10 of 18,009
Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04100
Plaintiff:
Zachary Andrew Bowers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brandt v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04089
Plaintiff:
Andrew Martin Brandt
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 si Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Songer, Jr. v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Andrew Songer, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graves v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06304
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GRAVES
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pedroza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11282
Plaintiff:
Andrew Pedroza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Andrews v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sheila Andrews
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Comer v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Comer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DICKERSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. DICKERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Decker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01932
Plaintiff:
Andrew Decker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neuman v O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NEUMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
