Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Autry v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
Vesta Autry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Autry v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brian Autry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Autry v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Wendy Autry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Autry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Autry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Autry v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv01745
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Autry
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Autry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Autry
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner NANCY A. BERRYHILL and Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Autry v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00472
Plaintiff:
Cleo Brian Autry
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Autry v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ann Autry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv01981
Plaintiff:
Autry Wright, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Autry v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv15009
Plaintiff:
Melissa Autry
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
