Cases 1 - 10 of 739
DESHIELDS v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAVIS ALAN DESHIELDS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STILL v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALAN STILL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moorman v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Moorman
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
BIERIG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv05934
Plaintiff:
ALAN BIERIG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sherfy v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Alan Sherfy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Kieffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Kieffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Ohlberg v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Steven Alan Ohlberg
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Woodend
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Palmer v. O'Malley
as 24-50263
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Palmer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Zeiser v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Alan Paul Zeiser
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
