Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BABB v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
CHE R. BABB and CHE ROLAND BABB
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Babb v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05111
Plaintiff:
Darren Babb
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Babb v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01901
Plaintiff:
Cole A. Babb
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Babb v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv03822
Plaintiff:
Annabelle G Babb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BABB v. SAUL
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
MORGAN F. BABB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Babb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv02172
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Yonette Babb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Babb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Elaine Babb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Babb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv04335
Plaintiff:
Yonette Babb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Babb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
Edward V. Babb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Babb v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
Dorene Babb
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
