Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mills v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00257
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Cody David Thomas Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Velasco v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Velasco
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
David Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hartley v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00300
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Hartley
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv01714
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Thomas, III
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv02621
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Cole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
ELLIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS ELLIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv01644
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Newton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yarber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Yarber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Herbert v Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv02014
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Herbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
