Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Speaks v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Speaks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blake v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Blake
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Havard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Havard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith-Edds v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Smith-Edds
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Willingham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Sherri Lynn Willingham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Moore
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Armes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Armes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Armes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023at00515
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Armes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
