Cases 1 - 10 of 1,510
Shah v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06275
Plaintiff:
Chirag H. Shah
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rothacker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv01587
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Shannon H. Rothacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
McCuan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. McCuan
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gabel v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv06156
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John H Gabel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoage v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06446
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Robert H Hoage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morris v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Angela H. Morris
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barriga v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03096
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Israel H Barriga
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GOURLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Brian H Gourley
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00409
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alisa H. Simonel Keegan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv06089
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Alisa H. Simonel Keegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
