Cases 101 - 110 of 951
Harry Williby v. USDC-CASF
as 21-71353
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HARRY J. WILLIBY, SERGEY BRIN, LARRY PAGE and others
Petitioner:
HARRY J. WILLIBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Schmidt v. A3 Smart Home LP
as 2:2021cv01797
Plaintiff:
Nicole Schmidt
Defendant:
A3 Smart Home LP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Prime Plating Aerospace, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv08283
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant:
Prime Plating Aerospace, Inc., Schmidt Industries, Inc., Prime Plating Aerospace, Inc. a Nevada corporation doing business as Prime Plating and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Midwest Cooling Towers Inc v. Schmidt
as 5:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Midwest Cooling Towers Inc
Defendant:
Shane Schmidt
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY V. SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC. ET AL
as 2:2021cv01304
Petitioner:
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC., GARY E. SCHMIDT, THERESE SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
MMG Insurance Company v. Schmidt Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
MMG Insurance Company
Defendant:
Schmidt Landscaping, Inc., Gary E. Schmidt, Therese Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kayda et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01233
Plaintiff:
Becky Kayda, Arlene Donald, Judith Stockwell and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Arroyo v. Southwood Realty Company
as 21-2293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, in its official capacity, HERMAN RATCHFORD, JR., in his official and personal capacities, DAN W. RATCHFORD, in his official and personal capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
