Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Berns v. Labaton Sucharow LLP, et al
as 20-1365
Plaintiff:
ANDOVER COMPANIES EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated and JAMES PEHOUSHEK-STANGELAND
Interested Party:
KELLER RORHBACK L.L.P., GERALD E. ROSEN, WILLIAM R. TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
STATE STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC, STATE STREET CORPORATION and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
In Re Goldman Sachs Group
as 18-2557
Petitioner:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Lloyd C. Blankfein, David A. Viniar and others
Respondent:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, West Virginia Investment Management Board and Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Prothena Corporation plc et al
as 3:2018cv02865
Defendant:
Prothena Corporation plc, Tran B. Nguyen, Sarah Noonberg and others
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Petitioner:
Simon James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re MIMEDX GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv00830
Defendant:
MiMedx Group, Inc., Parker H. Petit, Michael J. Senken and others
Plaintiff:
Norman MacPhee, Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois and Matthew Kline
Petitioner:
Scott Nelson, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Municipal Employees' Retirement System of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sjunde Ap-Fonden and The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. General Electric Company, et al.
as 1:2017cv08457
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Immelt, General Electric Company, John Flannery and others
Plaintiff:
Jihad A. Hachem, International Fund Management S.A., Deka International S.A. and others
Petitioner:
Richard D. Haynie, New York City Police Pension Fund, New York City Fire Pension Fund and others
Interested Party:
Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Gopal Mirani
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Arkansas Teacher Retirement Sy v. Nimble Storage, Inc., et al
as 17-17232
:
In re: NIMBLE STORAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff; Individually and On Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons and Entities
Defendant - Appellee:
NIMBLE STORAGE, INC., SURESH VASUDEVAN, ANUP V. SINGH and others
St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund v. Frontier Communications Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01825
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Corp. , Daniel McCarthy , John M. Jureller and others
Plaintiff:
St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund
Movant:
Richard Linke , Raymond East, Jr. , Michael Holub and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Frontier Communications, Corp. Stockholders Litigation
as 3:2017cv01617
Defendant:
Donald W. Daniels, John M. Jureller, Ralph Perley McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Bray and Gene R. Wills
Petitioner:
Kevin Demet, John Dubois, Raymond East, Jr. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Larraine D. Segil, Larisa Rosenberg, St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Daniel McCarthy, Peter C.B. Bynoe, Mizuho Securities USA Inc. and others
In Re:
Frontier Communications, Corp. Stockholders Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Troll v. Adeptus Health Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Sascha Troll , Li-Kuan Chen, Yvonne Chen and others
Defendant:
Gregory W. Scott , Thomas S. Hall , Frank R Williams , Jr. and others
Movant:
Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System et al v. Musk et al
as 1:2017cv00461
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Boston Retirement System, Roofers Local 149 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Elon Musk, Brad W. Buss, Robyn M. Denholm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
