Cases 11 - 20 of 1,463
Black v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv10634
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Black and Yvonne Black [E-filer]
Defendant:
Michael J. Murphy, Jason Pless, Reginald Van Wulfen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goode, et al v. Montalbano
as 24-1171
Plaintiff:
JAMES COREY GOODE and GOODE ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Counter Claimant:
ALYSSA CHRYSTIE MONTALBANO
Defendant:
JIRKA RYSAVY, GAIA, INC, WARKINS BRAD and others
Cross Defendant:
LIGHT WARRIOR LEGAL FUND, LLC, DAVID WILCOCK, THE WILCOCK SPIRITUAL HEALING AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION and others
Mitchell v. Weaks, Sr
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Brad Mitchell
Defendant:
Michael A. Weaks, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Argentum Risk Partners LLC v. Schaeffer
as 24-1090
Not Yet Classified:
ARGENTUM RISK PARTNERS LLC, BRAD SCHAEFFER and B.P. SCHAEFFER HOLDINGS LLC
Zelesnik v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Joe Citero, John Rice and others
PATTERSON v. OPTUMRX, INC.
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
OptumRX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sinkevitch v. Cain
as 24-2508
Petitioner:
BRETT A. SINKEVITCH
Respondent:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brave Law Firm v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, et al
as 24-3028
Plaintiff:
BRAVE LAW FIRM, LLC
Defendant:
TRUCK ACCIDENT LAWYERS GROUP, INC., BRAD PISTOTNIK LAW, P. A. and BRADLEY A. PISTOTNIK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
