Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Dale Sundby v. USDC-CASD
as 20-73530
Not Classified By Court:
KIMBERLY GILL RABINOFF, In re: DALE SUNDBY, CHRISTOPHER MYERS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Ardaneh v. US Government, et al
as 20-1887
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT, HEATHER STROUD, US JEWISH MAFIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAMID REZA ARDANEH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Christopher Myer
as 17-30159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RAY MYERS, AKA Christopher Myers
Surrey Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. The Surrey Phase IV Owners' Association, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv03218
Plaintiff:
Surrey Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Defendant:
The Surrey Phase IV Owners' Association, Inc. , The Surrey Grand Crowne Resort Owners Association, Inc. and The Surrey Condominium Association, Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
Leon Basye , Capital Resorts Group , CRG Club Trust and others
Counter_claimant:
The Surrey Condominium Association, Inc. , The Surrey Phase IV Owners' Association, Inc. and The Surrey Grand Crowne Resort Owners Association, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Leon Basye , CRG Club Trust , Capital Resorts Group and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
US v. Christopher Myer
as 13-4035
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MYERS
United States of America v. Christopher Myers
as 0:2012cv61865
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv15652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
